On Truth and Falsity in their Intertextual Sense: Adaptation as Dissimulation

Authors

  • Nico Dicecco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/2369-7326.32159

Abstract

While critics have rejected fidelity as a ground for the analysis of adaptations since the seminal work of George Bluestone in 1957, the logic of source-faithfulness nonetheless persists in popular discourse. This essay considers the persistence of fidelity idealism by positing its basic assumptions as a necessary component for the interpretation of adaptations as such. It argues that fidelity discourse depends on the fallacious assumption that, at some level, an adaptation can replicate elements of a source text in a new medium. By shifting focus from the ostensibly inherent features of the adaptive text to the perceptions of the reader or viewer, it can be seen that adaptation is a class of metaphor, depending on what Nietzsche calls “equating the unequal.” Thus adaptation is paradoxical; it is necessarily different from its source text, but must be understood as partially replicating that source in order to be meaningful as an adaptation.

References

Andrew, Dudley. Concepts in Film Theory. New York: Oxford UP, 1984. Web. 30 November 2010.

Black, Max. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1962. Print.

Cartmell, Deborah, and Imelda Whelehan. Screen Adaptation: Impure Cinema. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11153-1

Cutchins, Dennis, Laurence Raw, and James M. Welsh, eds. The Pedagogy of Adaptation Studies. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow P, 2010. Print.

Cutchins, Dennis, Laurence Raw, and James M. Welsh, eds. Redefining Adaptation Studies. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow P, 2010. Print.

Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” Writing and Difference. 1967. Trans. Alan Bass. London: Routledge, 2005. 351-70. Print.

Frus, Phyllis, and Christy Williams, eds. Beyond Adaptation: Essays on Radical Transformations of Original Works. Jefferson: McFarland, 2010. Print.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203957721

Goldberg, Matt. “Updates on Frank Miller’s Sin City 2 and Hard Boiled.” Collider.com. 29 Oct 2009. Web. 9 Jan 2009.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. Print.

Leitch, Thomas. “Adaptation Studies at a Crossroads.” Adaptation: The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies 1.1 (2008): 63-77. Web. 4 Dec 2010.

Leitch, Thomas. “Twelve Fallacies in Contemporary Adaptation Theory.” Criticism 45.2 (2003): 149-71. Web. 18 Nov 2010.

Lloyd, Jake. “Ultimate 20 Comic Book Film Adaptations.” Fandomania. 9 Sep 2009. Web. 9 Jan 2011.

Longworth, Karina. “The SIN CITY Comparison Library.” The Moviefone Blog. AOL, 5 Apr 2005. Web. 4 Dec 2010.

McFarlane, Brian. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1996. Print.

Murray, Simone. “Materializing Adaption Theory: The Adaption Industry.” Literature Film Quarterly 36.1 (2008): 4-20. Web. 24 Nov 2010.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Falsity in their Extramoral Sense.” 1873. Essays on Metaphor. Ed. W. Shibles. Whitewater: Language P, 1972. 1-14. Print.

Raitt, George. “Still Lusting After Fidelity?” Literature Film Quarterly 38.1 (Jan 2010): 47-58. Web. 13 Nov 2010.

Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Trans. Robert Czerny. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1975. Print.

Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. New York: Routledge, 2006. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203087633

Sin City. Dirs. Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller. Dimension Films, 2005. DVD.

Stam, Robert. “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation.” Film Adaptation (2000): 54-76. Print.

Stam, Robert. “Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Eds. Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 1-52. Print.

Usumezbas, Anil. “Top 10 Comic Book/Graphic Novel Adaptations,” The Long Take. 11 Aug 2008. Web. 9 Jan 2011.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dicecco, N. (2011). On Truth and Falsity in their Intertextual Sense: Adaptation as Dissimulation. Pivot: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies and Thought, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25071/2369-7326.32159